Even if the FT232 RXD/TXD/DSR/CTS/etc pins are left floating it is recognized by Linux as soon as it is plugged in. For example, lsusb lists it.
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> Sent: December 3, 2020 12:52 AM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] USB - Serial question Does it work that way? On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:12 PM <ken.stra...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would be great but if the USB-serial has power then it is found > in the USB enumeration even if the MCU is busy Really? How is it enumerated without the need for the MCU to send data? Getting power is not enough. The Linux side needs to see an "ACK" from the setup. > and ignoring the serial data stream. > There is no serial data stream, not until after the USB device sends "ACK" and is enumerated as a serial device. That has not yet happened That is why I was considering holding a FT232 in RESET If you use an FT232 then maybe it is simply pre-programmed and some hack is required because you can't access the code inside the chip. I think this is an argument for not using FT232 Just connect the USB pins fom the MCU directly. and then you have control over what happens. I would not suggest a hardware solution when what needs to be done is in the standard protocall. If this USB device is based on an MCU that is supported by Arduino IDE then there is example code in the IDE. See where XXX.begin is called. Where XXX is "mouse" or "keyboard" What you do is not call the .begin method until you want Linux to notice the device. XXX is a wrapper of subclass aroud something like "pluggableUSB". You can experiment with an Arduino and see that it can have any delay t like between being plugged in and being noticed as a new device. until everything is > ready to process commands. The relay in the USB cable suggested by > John would do what you suggest. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> > Sent: December 2, 2020 10:33 PM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] USB - Serial question > > So PP does the scan of USB devices and does not see your device. It > will not see your device because it is still initializing and is > ignoring the "set up" > packets. Finally, your device responds and then PP responds to the > connection. The trick is to NOT connect until you are ready. You do not > want PP to see the USB device. So ignore the USB setups > > This way the device never completes the "plug-in" until it is ready. > > Eventually the device is done all the home and self-test operations > and is ready and PP responds to the plug-in event. > > There are many other USB devices that do this. Think about any device that > is powered from the USB 5 volts supply. It is not even booted until after > the power is there so it must do the USB connection as the very last > thing only after it is up and running. > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:55 PM <ken.stra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Chris wrote: I think USB takes care of this for you. "set up" > > packets are sent by the host (the PC) and never by the device > > (mouse, disk, or > > whatever) > > The device never starts doing anything until after it hears from the > host. > > > > You've precisely described my problem! I need to do somewhat time > > consuming initialization -- home some steppers, actuate a pneumatic > > cylinder, prime a pump, verify coolant pressure, etc. Soon after > > PathPilot starts it scans for my USB device and, if found, sends a > > query to ensure that I'm actually alive. If I ignore or reject the > > alive query then PathPilot ignores me until my USB disconnects and > > then reconnects. > > > > My problem is that I may not yet know if I will ever be alive and > > ready when I'm first asked. I have a plan to queue any host requests > > received while I'm still initializing. > > > > Probably more explanation than you wanted! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> > > Sent: December 2, 2020 6:20 PM > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > > <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] USB - Serial question > > > > I think USB takes care of this for you. "set up" packets are sent > > by the host (the PC) and never by the device (mouse, disk, or > > whatever) The device never starts doing anything until after it > > hears from the host. The host > > (Linux) is constantly polling the USB port > > > > So let's say the device was faster than the PC. then the device would > > wait for "setup packets" before enumerating. What if the PC sent "setup" > > before the device was alive. Then nothing happens and the PC keeps > "setup" > > until the device boots. > > > > I think this is done 1000 times per second so the connection is > > started only a millisecond after the slower end is running. Then > > the next thing is they have to agree on speed and power usage. > > > > The protocol takes care of one being faster, power, and which USB > > standard is to be used. > > > > I don't think you need to even fully understand if you use a USB > > library to handle it. > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:04 PM John Dammeyer > > <jo...@autoartisans.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com] > > > > OK, then you likely don't need a FT232 chip. The microcontroller, > > > > whichever one you use, will likely have USB2 built-in. Or just make > > > sure > > > > it does, so many chips have this. > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:00 PM <ken.stra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > To clarify: > > > > > I am working on an accessory for a Tormach mill running > > > > > PathPilot (a flavour of LinuxCNC). It is for personal use so I > > > > > don't need to especially > > > worry > > > > > about product cost but obviously I'd rather not spend a lot on > > > something > > > > > that may eventually be abandoned when I get a better idea. I > > > > > could > > > modify > > > > > the Tormach source code to solve my timing problems but I'd > > > > > prefer to > > > use > > > > > it > > > > > unchanged to ease the installation of their updates. > > > > > > It appears the issues isn't so much whether a processor with > > > internal or external USB is used. Even an internal one can be > > > disabled so it won't be enumerated by the PC OS. > > > > > > The problem appears to be that the Arduino project takes longer to > > > do what it does on start-up than LinuxCNC does to send a couple of > > > requests out the USB/Serial port. > > > > > > There are two problems as I see it. > > > 1. If you wake up the USB too soon but don't listen to it then you > > > miss the messages and hang then waiting for them. > > > 2. If you don't initialize the USB port then from LinuxCNC > > > perspective the device doesn't exist and it probably won't > > > initialize or respond > > anymore. > > > > > > Since I don't know exactly what Ken is expecting from the Tormach > > > software it's hard to give really good suggestions. I'd make > > > opening the Serial Port for the USB connection the highest > > > priority operation in > > the Arduino > > > project. Now at least you can get the messages. > > > > > > With this in mind what does the Tormach do if the USB is not > > > plugged > in. > > > Then after the Ardunio has powered up, done the motion control > > > operations it needs to do and is ready, you plug in the USB? > > > > > > Does the Tormach then evaluate that there is now a serial port and > > > send those one or two messages? > > > > > > Ie. First evaluate all the permutations on the Tormach side. You > > > may > > find > > > you have no choice but to modify the Tormach. Or alternatively you > lie > > > to the Tormach and tell it you are ready when you aren't. But > > > then hold off on any other commands from it until you are. > > > > > > Of course if that means "Is the Tool changer out of the way so I > > > can home?" question may need an NO even if it is. Then a YES > > > after the Arduino is done. > > > > > > John Dammeyer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Chris Albertson > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > -- > > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
