On Wed, 2 Feb 2022, Thaddeus Waldner wrote:

Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 01:39:29 -0600
From: Thaddeus Waldner <thadw...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
    <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Enhanced Machine Controller <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Emc-users] Stepper PID

??Hi,

I have a pi4 running the 2.8.2 iso. I have it connected to a Mesa 7i96 and from there I??m driving small stepper motors with tmc2209 ??stepstick?? drivers. I think my step rate at max speed is around 8khz

I get around +-70us? Max latency.

I??ve been having an issue with what I think is latency which makes the steppers sound like they have bad bearings. Raising the servo period to 2ms made it worse. So I tried a faster servo thread and discovered the issue pretty much goes away with the servo period at 250us. At that rate I start running into joint following issues. 5A I then learned that with the servo period at 1ms, if I lower the stepper PID P parameter to 100 instead of the 1000 set by the configuration wizard, the noise goes away completely and the steppers run buttery smooth.

I have a few questions:
1) what are the implications of running the PID stepper with p=100?


Worse following error


2>) why is servo thread jitter even making into the stepper pulse train with a
Mesa Ethernet card and no communication errors? Do I have anything misconfigured?


The problem is that the PID loop makes bogus velocity corrections because of
position sample time jitter (which may be as high as a few hunderd usec on
RPI4 Ethernet)


I suspect that you are not using the DPLL, or that it is not setup properly. For a RPI4 I would suggest these settings:


setp hm2_7i76e.0.dpll.01.timer-us -200
set hm2_7i76e.0.stepgen.timer-number 1

These should reduce the stepgenb position sampling jitter to a
fraction of 1 usec.

Thanks






Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to