When using an adaptive/high speed machining tool path, make sure that the 
minimum radius for movement of the tool is a reasonable number (10% or more of 
the tool dia.).

When doing the final clearing pass you can also use plunge roughing at the 
corners if you cannot go to a significantly smaller diameter tool than the 
corner radius.

> On Sep 10, 2022, at 6:33 AM, Jérémie Tarot <silopo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Le sam. 10 sept. 2022 à 11:55, Nicklas SB Karlsson <n...@nksb.eu> a écrit :
> 
>> Then pocket milling with tool engagement less than tool diameter for
>> some patterns tool engagement increase to tool diameter in the corners
>> or ends. Anybody have anyone have any experience or knowledge how to
>> handle this situation?
>> 
> 
> Generally, the best option is to have a tool radius < to corner radius to
> avoid having 1/4 to 1/2 of the tool engaged.
> When possible my prefered strategy is rough adaptive clearing with a bigger
> tool, then rough adaptive clearing of the corners with a smaller tool and
> (or directly) finishing pass with the same smaller tool.
> 
> If tool radius = corner radius, best would be some kind of adaptive path to
> clear as much of material with limited engagement before the last clearing
> pass. The latter ideally being slowed down both in feed and speed.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to