Greetings to all the other stepper experts here.

I got the double ended motors for an Ender5+ today.

Other than the paint job and wiring, leads instead of sockets, they look identical to the motor currently on the Ender5+ for Y drive. No perceived improvement.

I can probably program klipper to drive then both with a separate 5160 driver per motor, get another bracket, mount then butt to butt with one coil reversed, locked together with a 5mm to 5mm coupling,to maintain X squareness making them into one motor with twice the torque.

The big IF is whether the drivers always power up at the same state before any move is commanded, I don't want x square to be a random driver power up fight.

Its either make that work, or figure out some sort of a backlashless bevel gear from one of the 3 phase motors that are all nema-23's so far. That would be ideal if the fault line could be used to freeze things if it ever loses home by even one step. Something the 3 phase nema 23's can do automatically.

Best antibacklash is not a bevel gear, but likely a jackshaft from the nema 23 to a short shaft where the nem-17 motor is now. Even a 1NM 3 phase would be 200% of the torque of whats in there now.

Which way, two nema-17 motors, or a nema 23 and a jackshaft with 30 tooth pulleys, would you guys opt for?

Thanks for your thoughts!

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/>


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to