William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in
> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after
> emms-player-finished-hook?
Hm. I'd want it to be customizable.
Quick poll:
`emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'?
Regards,
-- Jorgen
--
((email . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") (www . "http://www.forcix.cx/";)
(gpg . "1024D/028AF63C") (irc . "nick forcer on IRCnet"))
_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
