William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in >>> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after >>> emms-player-finished-hook? >> >> Hm. I'd want it to be customizable. >> >> Quick poll: >> >> `emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'? > > `emms-player-next-function'. :-)
Seconded. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC
pgpyAZuswc8Ab.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
