>> And installing a binary on the user's system by default doesn't sound
>> right to me when they are compiling and installing an elisp package;
>> it isn't expected behavior.
>
> I disagree with this: when I run "make", I expect that the full
> software will be built, not just a part of it (I mean only *.el
> files), so my opinion is that 'emms-print-metadata' should be built by
> default, but you are the boss here :-)

Well, no. I'm just the current maintainer.

Everyone, please write in with your opinions so that we can decide what
to do with this. If everyone thinks make should compile and install
`emms-print-metadata' then that is what we'll do.

P.S. Alex, how about write access to the Emms git repo?



-- 
   "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"

_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help

Reply via email to