----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
Mark and s:

Thanks for this line of inquiry and for this chance to share the most current 
chapter of my long fake story as it comes with a need for more.
I browsed and read from the Fake Factory and from your class, Mark, with great 
curiosity and admiration.

As someone who both produced and acted in a fake documentary a long time ago 
(Watermelon Woman, dir. Cheryl Dunye, 1996), and then co-edited an anthology 
about the genre shortly thereafter (F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and 
Truth’s Undoing, with Jesse Lerner, 2001), I (perhaps like you) had begun to 
think that everything had been said and done in this field of inquiry, and that 
it was losing or had lost its radical traction (see my “The Increasingly 
Unproductive 
Fake<http://nomorepotlucks.org/site/the-increasingly-unproductive-fake/>,” 2009)

It has been one of the many awful surprises of this moment to have known, 
taught, made art and thought about this modality for years—to be an expert in 
fakery—and to still come up short about the uses, abuses, insanity and drama of 
Fake News today. That is why learning from each other, and what we have done 
and what we are currently doing seems beyond critical to me. So thanks again 
for initiating this, Mark, there are great things to read and do on your 
sillybus (I have 
struggled<http://scalar.usc.edu/nehvectors/100hardtruths-fakenews/external?prev=http://scalar.usc.edu/nehvectors/100hardtruths-fakenews/index&link=http://wp.me/p5i00-18T>
 a great deal with the use of humor in writing, teaching, and making in these 
dark times, I must admit.)

When I look at Bruce Sterling’s intro to your 
book<http://www.romaeuropa.org/macme/?p=482> from 2010, Salvatore, and he 
writes about how fascinating this project will be in fifty years, I feel very 
sad and perplexed. Seven years later what he breathlessly projected for the 
future has happened in some kind of horrific sick reverse. As is true for 
Sterling, the way that time and the digital are altering, condensing, 
accelerating the use of the fake remains of great interest to me. I would love 
to hear people’s thoughts about this.

In this time, I have been trying to think about and enact and make better use 
of what my colleagues and I know about fake news and other truths in a rather 
desperate real-time 100-part project, the first part of which I completed as a 
digital edifice (an online primer) to align with the current administration’s 
first 100 days: 
#100hardtruths-#fakenews<http://scalar.usc.edu/nehvectors/100hardtruths-fakenews>.
 Now I have pledged to take my effort partially off the internet and do 
something more useful with it. I am trying to figure out how to use this dense, 
rich, weird primer to initiate collaborative activist public intellectualism 
and community-based pedagogy: something that takes time, that embraces 
complexity, community, art and theory, as well as everyday people’s own 
knowledge of their own truths on/of the internet. It seems this is something 
you made happen, Salvatore, but now some years ago. How relevant do you think 
your project is now (not in its subject, in its tactics?)

Looking at your question at the top of this thread, Mark, I suppose that my 
project, to date, wants to do something different, or perhaps complementary to 
your approach, "teaching people to write Fake News as a response to Fake News.” 
As I know you know, while this is pretty close to what I did with Learning from 
YouTube<https://mitpress.mit.edu/authors/alexandra-juhasz> (not that long 
ago!), writing in and against an internet platform and vernacular  I believe my 
work on #100hardtruths-#fakenews is pulling me into the orbit of some of Fake 
News’ (and social media’s) many other reverses: the freedom from truth 
discourses allowed by poetry and art, the freedom from monetization allowed by 
unplugging and refusing to sell or be sold, the solid power gained from 
listening to and honoring each others’ internet truths. My 100-day experience 
was mostly bleak, ending with two (and 
more<http://scalar.usc.edu/nehvectors/100hardtruths-fakenews/external?link=http://wp.me/p5i00-1cH&prev=http://scalar.usc.edu/nehvectors/100hardtruths-fakenews/index>)
 self-penned dark truisms that leave me largely cowed by our own culpability: 
"fake news r us" and "virality is virility"

The inevitable macho weaponization built upon the cascade of all of our little 
internet truths leaves me wondering, as I often have, if taking our actions and 
products beyond and outside this space, genre, posture, product must be part of 
the project.

As I can see from the work you have both shared, radical tactics are needed to 
engage with fake news, and I’m glad to see what you have done. I look forward 
to hearing and seeing other interventions from this list, as well as any 
insights people might have into making live performance art pedagogy born from 
digital questions and their online solutions.

alex juhasz


On Jun 17, 2017, at 1:56 AM, xDxD.vs.xDxD 
<xdxd.vs.x...@gmail.com<mailto:xdxd.vs.x...@gmail.com>> wrote:

----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
hi!

Anyone else have similar stories to tell?

a few years ago, we created a fake cultural institution.

https://medium.com/@xdxd_vs_xdxd/the-reinvention-of-reality-663ffa52d9da

The fake was so well done that they invited us at the cultural commission of 
the Italian senate, and the resulting conference was included in the list of 
EU's events on creativity for the year.

Eventually it became a book and a set of tools: an institution which becomes a 
DIY opensource toolkit :)

cheers!
s

--
[MUTATION] Art is Open Source -  
http://www.artisopensource.net<http://www.artisopensource.net/>
[CITIES] Human Ecosystems Relazioni - 
http://he-r.i<http://human-ecosystems.com/>t
[NEAR FUTURE DESIGN] Nefula Ltd - http://www.nefula.com<http://www.nefula.com/>
[RIGHTS] Ubiquitous Commons - 
http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org<http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org/>
---
Professor of Near Future and Transmedia Design at ISIA Design Florence: 
http://www.isiadesign.fi.it/
[https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aeGR4ZC52cy54ZHhkQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D&type=zerocontent&guid=5daa1de7-a0b7-4811-961e-9cfbd0bd07fa]ᐧ
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu


---------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
Thanks Mark for your comments.

First, I believe it is critically urgent to teach ALL of our students how to 
create fake news. Why? Because this first-hand engagement with the manipulation 
of the truth is the best way, in my opinion, to understand the manipulative 
power of language to distort meaning. It is also a powerful way to demonstrate 
how fake news can infiltrate the real world of information.

The reason why fake news is so dangerous is because so many people lack the 
critical skills to differentiate between manufactured news and the real thing. 
When this criticality is introduced to our students, they become the front line 
to defend humanity against the tyranny of the fake. The reason why TRUMP was 
elected is because there were enough people in this country who lacked the 
skills to see propaganda and fakery being wielded by domestic and foreign 
sources. This is how tyrants rise to power: preying upon the emotions of a 
constituency that is unable to interpret the source of their manipulation.

So, I say, WE who are educators are actually on the front lines of a battle to 
protect the integrity of truth and meaning. Unless we instill the ability to 
discern the tactics of fakery in the next generation, perhaps by training them 
to render its machinations, we are truly sunk.

Randall

From: Mark Marino <markcmar...@gmail.com<mailto:markcmar...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, June 16, 2017 at 4:18 AM
To: Randall Packer <rpac...@zakros.com<mailto:rpac...@zakros.com>>
Cc: soft_skinned_space 
<empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>>
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Speaking of Fake...

Randall,

That sounds like a perfect teaching moment, if a bit harrowing for you.  Sounds 
like both you and the student survived unscathed! It's interesting how fake 
stories flourish when they touch upon either likely content ("there they go 
again") or cultural panics.

What other assignments in fakery have folks on the list done?

I must admit that I have from time-to-time found myself in a little warmer 
water with some of my teaching antics.

One was the seemingly innocuous LA Flood Project, which imagines Los Angeles 
submerged under an epic deluge.  That project has a Twitter flood simulation 
side to it that occasionally crosses paths with folks who monitor either 
university news or weather news.

Some people get angry when they think we are in the Fony Fake territory, when 
we thought we were in the Fantasy Fake or Funny Fake land.  I suppose that just 
shows how subjective these realms are -- or to speak more to your experience -- 
how the partial attention we pay to and partial context we encounter on social 
media creates the perfect soup for misunderstanding.

Ah, misunderstanding soup.

Anyone else have similar stories to tell?

- Mark




On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Randall Packer 
<rpac...@zakros.com<mailto:rpac...@zakros.com>> wrote:
Greetings Mark and greetings list, I wanted to jump in here at the suggestion 
of how to teach fake news. Well, I’m not sure I have any real answers to Fake 
News Pedagogy, but I wanted to share a little story about my Internet Art & 
Culture class at the School of Art, Design & Media / Nanyang Technological 
University in Singapore.

Now Singapore may seem like an odd place to be infiltrating the academy with 
Fake News skills, but in fact my students embarked on a project to use Facebook 
Live to incorporate artistic fakery into their online practice. One of the 
students decided to stage a live broadcast from the student union as a fake 
reporter announcing that the university had gone 100% vegan. This seemingly 
harmless fake prank managed to get the attention of the university press 
office, and well in Singapore, you DO NOT WANT student parody to enter into the 
mainstream media (MSM) because people simply don’t do things like this and the 
press will think it’s the actual truth.

This little incident made it all the way up the administrative ladder until our 
Chair asked the faculty whose student this was and that they needed to attach a 
disclaimer. I eagerly said me, because I recognized a real teaching moment here 
for my terrified student. The fact is, my student had a first-hand experience 
understanding how fakery can make its way into the MSM, and just how corrosive 
and disturbing it is to manipulate or distort the truth. In our everyday social 
media life on the Net, we forget just how volatile and viral our fake 
utterances can be.

Of course, I have always believed that art should be dangerous and this 
assignment turned out to be the perfect way to educate the next generation of 
digital artists.

Yours “truly,”

Randall

From: 
<empyre-boun...@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre-boun...@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>>
 on behalf of Mark Marino <markcmar...@gmail.com<mailto:markcmar...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: soft_skinned_space 
<empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>>
Date: Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 12:21 AM
To: soft_skinned_space 
<empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>>
Subject: [-empyre-] Speaking of Fake...

----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
We continue our discussion of the art of Fake News and art and Fake News (etc.) 
with a somewhat unusual course.

At the start of 2017, launching on Inauguration Day, Talan Memmott and I 
offered a course through UnderAcademy College entitled, How to Write and Read 
Fake News: Journullism in the Age of Trump.  UnderAcademy College is a 
non-degree granting un-institution founded on the model of Black Mountain 
College.

The course offered to teach how to write Fake News (is my capitalization of 
that bugging anyone else but me?), although we may not have entirely been in 
bed with the devil.   Or if we were in bed with the devil, we were doing an 
awful lot of faking it.  And, consequently, were quite unsatisfied with his 
performance but had forfeited our right to blame other people for the bed we 
had made.  So you know, basically feeling like most of America. You can see the 
sillybus here:
https://medium.com/the-fake-news-reader/the-fake-news-course-sillybus-d68953d6abf5

All of the materials for this class are freely available online for your own 
adaptation and perversion.  And I should mention that this course, like all 
UnderAcademy College courses, is free and that I (still) have not been paid for 
teaching said course.

Our first lesson was: How to Fake News, which you can see here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex8Zi15UTJo

In that lesson, we introduced our (patent-pending) 80-20-10 method for writing 
Fake News.  Now, none of our 100-or-so students, real and fake, have reported 
back on whether or not this lesson led to them making mad money from their  
Fake News writing, but most accounts suggest that in spite of (or actually 
because of) a growing awareness of the scourge of Fake News, there's big money 
to be had.

And in the age of Trump, what more evidence of a successful educational 
operation could their be than loads of money -- or at least lawsuits?

How do you feel about teaching people to write Fake News as a response to Fake 
News? Does that sound sophomoric or are you just being uptight? We realize 
those aren't the only two options, so we have an open essay response we're also 
accepting but probably won't count towards your grade.

Love,
Mark
_______________________________________________ empyre forum 
empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au> 
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu



--
Teacher/Writer/Thinker/Spy
http://markcmarino.com
http://haccslab.com

Pebbles already has a boyfriend.”

sentence #5 from E-Sig
Micro-novel (limited edition) (being published one sentence at a time via my 
email signature). Collect them all by writing to me frequently or by trading 
with my friends.  Sentences will be updated periodically.
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu

_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu

Reply via email to