I also vote FOR independent lengths. Thanks,
Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David McGrew > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:51 AM > To: Alan DeKok > Cc: emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths > > Hi Alan, > > I vote FOR independent lengths, because it will promote > algorithm agility. > > David > > On Aug 5, 2008, at 3:09 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: > > > The current draft assumes that key lengths for MAC are the same as > > the MAC output length, and states this as a constraint. > The counter- > > example is AES-CMAC-256, which has a 256 bit key for AES, and a 128 > > bit output. > > > > The question for the WG is whether or not this is > relevant. The feel > > of the room at IETF was that the lengths should be independent. We > > are looking for WG consensus on this issue. > > > > Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths > > independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. > > > > Alan DeKok. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emu mailing list > > Emu@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
