As far as I can tell, we will not be the first ones using such a scheme.
".home.arpa." defined in RFC 8375
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8375.html) allows sub domains. It
says: "For an administrative domain that uses subdomains of
'home.arpa.', such as a homenet, the recursive resolvers provided by
that domain will be able to answer queries for subdomains of 'home.arpa.'"
We are taking a more conservative approach where subdomains need expert
review and registration before they are allocated and can be used in
deployments.
--Mohit
On 3/22/24 09:30, Alan DeKok wrote:
On Mar 22, 2024, at 1:58 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
I think its an IAB question. IANA with implement whatever we ask for.
It would be EMU's Expert Reviewers that would decide, I guess.
It's late in the week to pigeon hole someone, but ... maybe we can find
someone.
OK.
Is a sub-domain the only technical solution?
I'm sure we will need to answer that.
I don't think it's the only technical solution. But it's a very good one.
If we don't use subdomains, then we have to use user portions in a
well-known format. e.g.
provisioning.t...@eap.arpa
instead of
provision...@teap.eap.arpa
I think the second looks clearer to me.
Alan DeKok,
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Femu&data=05%7C02%7Cmohit.sethi%40aalto.fi%7Cfb9fb88083ca4a5ef85208dc4a24a4d1%7Cae1a772440414462a6dc538cb199707e%7C1%7C0%7C638466768444326336%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2BXBJ0hiTOat7lVelLhLTfl07E%2BBHqUdZt3CEcidf50%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
