13th session of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable 
Development  -  Issue #3 

EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <http://www.iisd.org>

Written and edited by:

Twig Johnson, Ph.D. 
Amber Moreen 
Miquel Mu�oz 
Chris Spence 
Andrey Vavilov, Ph.D. 

Editor:

Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director, IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Vol. 5 No. 220
Wednesday, 13 April 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/csd/csd13/ 

CSD-13 HIGHLIGHTS:

TUESDAY, 12 APRIL 2005

Delegates met in two parallel sessions to engage in interactive 
discussions on water, sanitation, and human settlements. One group 
dealt with water and sanitation issues, including Integrated Water 
Resource Management (IWRM), access to basic water services, access 
to basic sanitation and hygiene, and wastewater treatment, 
recycling and reuse. The other group considered human settlements, 
focusing on access to housing and public services, job creation 
and enterprise promotion. The discussions on each topic were led 
by a panel of representatives from UN agencies and other 
organizations.

HUMAN SETTLEMENTS

ACCESS TO HOUSING AND PUBLIC SERVICES: This session, which took 
place on Tuesday morning, was chaired by CSD-13 Vice-Chair 
Husniyya Mammadova (Azerbaijan), who asked participants to focus 
on practical measures requiring concerted global or regional 
action.

Presentations: Dinesh Mehta, UN-HABITAT, highlighted the urban 
poor's lack of access to domestic capital markets. He explained 
that experiences with UN-HABITAT's Slum Upgrading Facility suggest 
that modest amounts of international financing can leverage much 
larger amounts of domestic capital. He also identified issues 
related to building technologies, public finance, land tenure, 
decentralization and strengthening local authorities.

Nefise Bazoglu, UN-HABITAT, explained that the international 
target of improving the lives of 100 million slum dwellers was 
established when there were no accurate assessments of slum 
dwellers' population and trends, adding that their numbers were 
now estimated at one billion. She concluded that slums can be 
transformed into improved human settlements. 

Discussion: In the ensuing discussion, participants raised a 
variety of issues, including the benefits of a rights-based 
approach and the importance of adequate, appropriate and 
innovative financing. A number of speakers also questioned whether 
the target of improving the lives of 100 million slum dwellers was 
adequate, highlighted the need for better disaster preparedness 
and planning, and stressed the need for an integrated and 
participatory approach. The importance of UN-HABITAT's role was 
strongly emphasized.

On financing, several developing country speakers urged 
industrialized nations to honor their funding commitments. NIGERIA 
said the Monterrey Consensus should be implemented, and debt 
relief extended. INDONESIA highlighted the importance of 
micro-financing. The REPUBLIC OF KOREA recommended an 
international credit fund for housing to give developing countries 
access to financial resources. The G-77/CHINA focused on financing 
issues, technology transfer, and South-South cooperation.

On partnerships and cooperation, LOCAL AUTHORITIES stressed the 
major role local authorities play in human settlements management, 
and urged closer partnerships between central governments and 
local authorities. TRADE UNIONS called for the inclusion of 
workers at the earliest stages of water, sanitation and housing 
projects. FRANCE highlighted the need for full stakeholder 
involvement. The US noted that solutions are unlikely to be 
top-down or centralized. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE proposed 
strengthening integrated land-use planning and tenure protection. 
The EU elaborated on key policy recommendations relating to 
secure tenure, housing, women's rights and governance.

On slum dwellers, SOUTH AFRICA questioned the adequacy of the 
current global target and spoke of the need for specific national 
and regional goals. NGOs said the goal should be changed to 
"reduce by half" the number of urban slum dwellers by 2020. 
AUSTRALIA said such targets should not be reopened. The US and EU 
said the recent UN-HABITAT Governing Council session agreed not to 
reopen the target. This perspective was questioned by SOUTH 
AFRICA.

JOB CREATION AND ENTERPRISE PROMOTION: On Tuesday afternoon, 
Vice-Chair Boo Nam Shin (Republic of Korea) convened a session on 
job creation and enterprise promotion in the context of human 
settlements.

Presentation: Kees van der Ree, International Labour Organization, 
discussed infrastructure investment for job creation and 
enterprise development, laws and regulatory frameworks, assistance 
to small enterprises, job creation for women and youth, and the 
development of an entrepreneurial culture.

Discussion: In the ensuing discussion, the EU elaborated on policy 
options for financing, and CHILDREN AND YOUTH highlighted the 
vulnerability of youth to slum problems. SCIENTIFIC AND 
TECHNOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES stressed the need for capacity building, 
and WOMEN recommended a gender rights approach to job creation. 
UN-HABITAT underscored the importance of preventing future slums 
from forming.

IRAN raised issues relating to refugees, as well as job creation 
for slum dwellers and those affected by natural disasters. 
BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY identified "gaps" in the Chair's text 
relating to governance, enabling frameworks for sustainable job 
and enterprise creation, capacity building, technologies and 
innovation. The US highlighted the needs of young people and 
women, citing examples of successful and replicable 
multi-stakeholder initiatives. TRADE UNIONS drew attention to 
research into companies' employment practices that identifies 
successes and failures in supporting sustainable employment, 
accusing ABN AMRO of investment policies that supported 
companies with "horrendous" working conditions. Ghana, for the 
AFRICAN GROUP, highlighted poverty, lack of capacity, HIV/AIDS, 
refugees, rapid urbanization, and public debt as major 
obstacles to job creation.

WATER AND SANITATION

INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND ACCESS TO BASIC WATER 
SERVICES: On Tuesday morning, participants discussed water issues, 
focusing on IWRM and access to basic water services. The session 
was chaired by CSD-13 Vice-Chair Dagmara Berbalk (Germany).

Presentations on IWRM: Roberto Lenton, Global Water Partnership, 
reflected on IWRM's importance in attaining the MDGs. He noted the 
catalyzing role of the 2005 target for IWRM plans, as well as 
declining resources allocated to water issues. Joachim Harlin, 
UNDP, emphasized the need to improve the knowledge base, empower 
local actors, create incentives to support decentralization, and 
link IWRM and infrastructure development. He suggested developing 
a practitioners' guide to operationalize agreed policy options.

Presentations on Access to Basic Water Services: Jamal Saghir, 
World Bank, focused on financing issues, including charges for 
water services and subsidizing the poor. He also noted the 
challenge of decentralization and governance, and emphasized the 
increasing role of the local private sector. 

Ravi Narayanan, WaterAid, stressed the importance of more and 
better water and sanitation financing, effective governance, 
community participation, accountability, and authentic and 
accessible information in attaining the MDGs.

Discussion: On IWRM, the INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR AGRICULTURAL 
DEVELOPMENT called for a greater rural focus. UNEP identified 
economic development, social equity, and environmental 
sustainability as central to IWRM. The G-77/CHINA underscored the 
need to apply IWRM in a country-specific manner, a view supported 
by NORWAY, the RUSSIAN FEDERATION and others. The EU suggested 
linking IWRM with broader development plans, decentralizing to the 
lowest appropriate level and coordinating monitoring of the MDGs 
and IWRM implementation. SWITZERLAND suggested involving 
representatives of related multilateral environmental agreements 
(MEAs), while AUSTRALIA voiced reservations about extending MEAs' 
mandates. BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY supported IWRM as a framework to 
reduce water supply risks.

On access to basic water services, IRAN, BANGLADESH, SOUTH AFRICA, 
and TRADE UNIONS endorsed a rights-based approach, while several 
others supported a market-based approach. 

Many speakers reported on national implementation activities, and 
a considerable number welcomed the ecosystem approach. CANADA 
emphasized science and information sharing. SWITZERLAND encouraged 
debt-for-nature swaps. NGOs suggested that CSD-13 produce a 
country-specific table of commitments. The US underscored the 
importance of partnerships. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE called for 
integrating indigenous knowledge. The Philippines encouraged 
South-South and "triangular" cooperation, while FRANCE noted 
North-South cooperation. The EC identified the implementation of 
Monterrey Consensus commitments, innovative funding mechanisms, 
and empowerment of local authorities as practical measures. 
LESOTHO urged acknowledgment of HIV/AIDS as a constraint. Mexico 
discussed the need for mechanisms, such as catchment councils, to 
resolve disputes. The INTERNATIONAL RAINWATER HARVESTING ALLIANCE, 
supported by others, encouraged an emphasis on rainwater 
harvesting. WOMEN emphasized the importance of land tenure and 
urged governments to ensure that industry internalizes pollution 
externalities. TUVALU called for the establishment of a funding 
facility for LDCs and SIDS and for an implementation review of 
water actions relevant to SIDS.

ACCESS TO BASIC SANITATION AND HYGIENE, AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT, 
RECYCLING AND REUSE: On Tuesday afternoon, participants engaged in 
discussions on sanitation issues in a session chaired by CSD-13 
Vice-Chair Khaled Elbakly (Egypt).

Presentations: Ede Ijjasz, World Bank, emphasized institutional 
and coordination challenges in sanitation, stakeholder 
involvement, the need for clear regulations and affordable 
options, interaction between households and authorities, and the 
importance of behavioral change. 

Vanessa Tobin, UNICEF, called for a reduction in disparities 
between sanitation facilities in Africa and Asia. She suggested 
prioritizing sanitation, decentralizing and supporting 
community-led initiatives, targeting school and health 
facilities, involving all stakeholders, and improving the role of 
UN agencies. Gouri Ghosh, Water Supply and Sanitation 
Collaborative Council, called for a "paradigm shift" in 
sanitation, and focused on concrete collaborative actions and 
tools to be used for improving sanitation services. He stressed 
the importance of community-driven initiatives and building 
coalitions of governments and stakeholders. 

Veerle Vanderwerd, UNEP, suggested, inter alia, strengthening the 
WET-WASH campaign and the Whitewater to Bluewater initiative. 
Jamie Bartram, WHO, discussed the adverse impacts of wastewater 
mismanagement, the need for information to support evidence-based 
policymaking, and strengthening of regional processes and 
coordination.

Discussion: In the ensuing discussion, France noted its commitment 
to doubling aid devoted to sanitation. CHILDREN AND YOUTH, 
supported by many participants, emphasized the importance of 
sanitation education. The G-77/CHINA proposed a 10-year programme 
on wastewater management in line with the Marrakech Process. The 
EU urged transparency in subsidies and reflection of sanitation 
priorities in national budgets. He called for an enlargement of 
the mandate of UN-Water. The UK highlighted the potential role of 
the International Finance Facility. 

Many countries noted the need for micro-credit, debt relief, 
integration of women into all stages of the process, adequate 
school sanitation facilities, consideration of cultural 
impediments to reuse, and a rights-based approach to sanitation. 
BOTSWANA noted the need for affordable wastewater treatment, and 
the problems associated with HIV/AIDS. The US called for a 
web-based mechanism to support exchange of experiences, noting 
that means of implementation issues should not be reopened. TRADE 
UNIONS proposed scaling-up sanitation as a public good and a right 
of citizens. COLOMBIA supported public-private partnerships, 
MEXICO supported awareness raising programmes in schools, and IRAN 
highlighted wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse in arid and 
semi-arid areas. 

Summarizing the discussion, Veerle Vanderwerd noted the positive 
exchange of ideas and said the challenge now was to select a few 
key issues and practical mechanisms that could be decided on by 
CSD-13. Jamie Bartram highlighted comments on technology 
innovation, information sharing, UN-Water's role, and links to 
health issues.

IN THE CORRIDORS

As CSD-13's first full day of interactive discussions on water, 
sanitation and human settlements drew to a close late Tuesday 
afternoon, some participants who had complained in the morning 
about the quality of interactions seemed to have had a change of 
heart. Earlier in the day, there were suggestions that too much 
time was being spent on domestic measures that were hard to 
translate into practical policies. However, as the day progressed, 
the sentiment changed, with several delegates pointing to more 
focused and relevant interventions. A number of participants 
seemed pleased with the interactive nature of the discussions and 
the steps taken to integrate Major Groups. A few observers were 
also heard praising the G-77/China for its efforts to develop a 
conference room paper on an implementation review procedure for 
the CSD and matrices for CSD-13 outcomes.




This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin � <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is 
written and edited by Twig Johnson, Ph.D., Amber Moreen, Miquel 
Mu�oz, Chris Spence, and Andrey Vavilov, Ph.D. The Digital Editor 
is Leila Mead. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the Director of IISD Reporting Services is 
Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Sustaining 
Donors of the Bulletin are the Government of the United States of 
America (through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the 
Government of Canada (through CIDA), the Swiss Agency for 
Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United Kingdom 
(through the Department for International Development - DFID), the 
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of Germany 
(through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the 
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the European 
Commission (DG-ENV). General Support for the Bulletin during 2005 
is provided by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 
the Government of Australia, the Austrian Federal Ministry of 
Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, the 
Ministry of Sustainable Development and the Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs of Sweden, the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs of Norway, the Ministry of Environment and the 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Swan International, the 
Japanese Ministry of Environment (through the Institute for Global 
Environmental Strategies - IGES) and the Japanese Ministry of 
Economy, Trade and Industry (through the Global Industrial and 
Social Progress Research Institute - GISPRI), and the Italian 
Ministry of Environment. Funding for translation of the Earth 
Negotiations Bulletin into French has been provided by the 
International Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) and the 
French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Funding for the translation of 
the Earth Negotiations Bulletin into Spanish has been provided by 
the Ministry of Environment of Spain. The opinions expressed in 
the Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do 
not necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors. 
Excerpts from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in 
non-commercial publications with appropriate academic citation. 
For information on the Bulletin, including requests to provide 
reporting services, contact the Director of IISD Reporting 
Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +1-646-536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. 
#21F, New York, NY 10017, USA. The ENB Team at CSD-13 can be 
contacted by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to Linkages Update to receive our fortnightly, html-newsletter on 
what's new in the international environment and sustainable development arena: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
- Archives of Climate-L and Climate-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/climate-L.htm
- Archives of Water-L and Water-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/water-L.htm

Reply via email to