On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 06:20 +0000, Carlo Contavalli wrote: > I just read your blog posts - pretty cool. But why not accept the > patch? If that option does not work for you (or others using gvfs), > they can simply not use that option.
Perhaps, as long as the argument contains a clear warning that it may not work on a desktop system or something. I'm not an encfs developer though, so it's not my call. > I would also argue that this is an issue in gvfs / gnome, which should > be fixed there. Exactly, hopefully I will have a chance to do that someday, and then this patch will be perfect to finish off my project.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Encfs-users mailing list Encfs-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
