Ruud van Gaal wrote:
This all sounds familiar. I have this connection scheme with the following
properties:
- the server may not be online yet
- the client attempts a connection every second or 2, to see if the server
is already alive
- I only want 1 connection (client<->server)
I have a C++ wrapper (class QNClient) which only tracks 1 peer. This client
class is legacy and only represents 1 link to a server (class QNServer).
For repeated connection attempts, this was no problem in the past (without
ENet); I sent out some kind of CONNECT packet, and if something came back,
it was connected.
With the ENet peer, I start an enet_host_connect() with every connection
attempt. If I create an ENet host with only 1 peer, I run out of peers after
this first connect attempt.
It's a bit awkward, since if I allow more peers in the ENet host, multiple
peers may connect succesfully. I'll have to drop the surplus of connections
once the server comes up and it turns out I get multiple
ENET_EVENT_TYPE_CONNECT events.
It seems to work though with 1 peer, I just get a lot of 'out of peer' error
when trying enet_host_connect(). I haven't tried resetting the peer; I don't
think I want to since a connect reply may still be incoming and I'd rather
handle that as usual.
Ruud
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Namens Daniel Aquino
Verzonden: Thursday, June 18, 2009 18:13
Aan: Discussion of the ENet library
Onderwerp: Re: [ENet-discuss] ENetPeer structure when reconnecting
Perhaps as I said you ran out of peers... So until the
callback stack was finished that peer wouldn't be free yet...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:23 PM, William
Brandt<[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel Aquino wrote:
>From what i know there is no deleting. I believe enet
will clean up
the peer after it has told you about the event and you have had a
chance to react. And the connection function will return a
new peer
with no way to re-use the existing peer that I know of...
Which does
confuse me a bit in the case of attempting to make a new connection
inside of the disconnection event when there is no more
peers left...
I don't know if in that case it would still consider that peer as
valid resulting in the inability to form a new connection or if it
would end up using that same peer destroying data inside of it that
you may still need... So I copied any data I needed from the peer
object before making the new connection just in case... I guess
these questions could be solved easily by looking into the
enet code
or setting the peer count to 1 and doing some testing...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, William
Brandt<[email protected]> wrote:
When a user is disconnected from the server and is
reconnecting, do I
need to get a new ENetPeer object (from the enet_host_connect()
function), or is it possible to use the same one to
reconnect? Also,
if I have to get a new one, do I need to delete the old one (& how)?
...
well what I'm doing now seems to be working...
the main problem I was having was that enet_host_connect() was
returning NULL when I tried to reconnect. It seems I had to
explicitly call
enet_peer_reset() on the old peer object before I reconnect
and get a
new peer object.
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
You should add a 5000ms delay when you call enet_host_service() to
check for connect events after calling enet_host_connect(). Then if
you don't get a response you can safely assume that the server isn't
going to respond and reset the peer then try again.
|
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
