It would be interesting if there was a standard way to transfer large amounts of data over ENet. Some of us might need to e.g., do video streaming, but the way to transfer the data might not be ideal or the best unless we're quite good at networking already (which I am not). I don't know if this would be a good idea, but I just wanted you to at least consider it.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Lee Salzman <[email protected]> wrote: > So, I'm just thinking in the back of my mind what sort of things would be > desired in a hypothetical version 2.0 of ENet that broke API compatibility > and so could do things that would otherwise not be possible in a 1.x > release. > > That doesn't mean that a 2.0 is in the near future, but I'd like to get a > dialogue going about it. > > Aside from IPv6 support, are there any other big things people would want > that are none-the-less realistic and not overly complicated? > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
