As a follow up I meant that it would allow us to simulate packet drops and packet sending speed. Also allowing to simulate a % for packet drop and packet sending through some parameter to the Host would be just as good if it's too complicated!
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Nuno Silva <[email protected]>wrote: > Also maybe some way to simulate different connection types so you could > test your game without having to have those connections, this is mostly > used in games but it would be very useful! > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Doug Warren <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Shared Peer ids: Unique IDs shared among all peers connected in a mesh >> connection. This would enable you to route a message to another peer if >> there is no direct connection due to firewall rules. >> >> New packet type of best effort last message of a channel: Any message >> for the channel would be unreliable but if we're sending a packet and the >> last acknowledged received sequence number is less than the last sent >> sequence number for that channel, a copy is sent anyway. This could be >> used for frequently changing things like position but if there's room >> you'll get the most recent position anyway. >> >> Packet out of ordering metrics: Can be added now easily enough, I always >> like thinking in terms of the console TCRs of requiring 64k throughput, 10% >> packet loss, 2% packet out of order. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Lee Salzman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So, I'm just thinking in the back of my mind what sort of things would >>> be desired in a hypothetical version 2.0 of ENet that broke API >>> compatibility and so could do things that would otherwise not be possible >>> in a 1.x release. >>> >>> That doesn't mean that a 2.0 is in the near future, but I'd like to get >>> a dialogue going about it. >>> >>> Aside from IPv6 support, are there any other big things people would >>> want that are none-the-less realistic and not overly complicated? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ENet-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ENet-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >> >> >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
