Support for multicast.
2013/4/30 Lee Salzman <[email protected]> > So, I'm just thinking in the back of my mind what sort of things would be > desired in a hypothetical version 2.0 of ENet that broke API compatibility > and so could do things that would otherwise not be possible in a 1.x > release. > > That doesn't mean that a 2.0 is in the near future, but I'd like to get a > dialogue going about it. > > Aside from IPv6 support, are there any other big things people would want > that are none-the-less realistic and not overly complicated? > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > > -- Benoit.
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
