I don't know if this hasn't been talked about in this mailing list at all, but there's this library called MiniUPnP and libnatpmp which you can find here: http://miniupnp.free.fr/
I haven't really implemented it on working code but it might make whoever decides to create a working sample's job easier. On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Erwin Coumans <[email protected]>wrote: > >>Set up a third-party ENet host C. Hosts A and B connect to C. C gives A > the address of B. A directly connects to B. A and B disconnect from C. > > I doubt this will work. What kind of addresses and ports are > exchanged? The global IP addresses is different from a local IP behind > a firewall. > > If NAT punchthrough were that simple, why would people use Libjingle for > it? > http://maemo.org/development/documentation/manuals/3-x/howto_use_stun_bora/ > > > It would be great if we can get a simple working sample source out of > this tread, > instead of long discussions how one could attempt to implement it. > Thanks! > Erwin > > > > >>There is no official sample, per se, but it perhaps bears repeating that > a NAT punchthrough implementation is as simple as: > >>Set up a third-party ENet host C. Hosts A and B connect to C. C gives A > the address of B. A directly connects to B. A and B disconnect from C. > > > On 05/04/2013 07:30 PM, Erwin Coumans wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I found many discussions on the topic but > > no working sample code for NAT punchthrough with enet. > > > > Is there any self-contained sample source that works with enet? > > Thanks, > > Erwin > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ENet-discuss mailing list > > ENet-discuss at cubik.org > > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
