Why do you doubt its working? Have you tried it before commenting?
That's exactly how NAT-punchtrough works.
NAT-punch isn't reliable if you're doing pure UDP. LibJingle makes sure
it's stable, too.
ENet resends lost packets and simulates connections ontop of UDP.
That'll work too.
Sounds like you want someone else to do the work for you.
On 2013-05-04 18:51, Erwin Coumans wrote:
Set up a third-party ENet host C. Hosts A and B connect to C. C gives A the
address of B. A directly connects to B. A and B disconnect from C.
I doubt this will work. What kind of addresses and ports are
exchanged? The global IP addresses is different from a local IP behind
a firewall.
If NAT punchthrough were that simple, why would people use Libjingle for it?
http://maemo.org/development/documentation/manuals/3-x/howto_use_stun_bora/
It would be great if we can get a simple working sample source out of
this tread,
instead of long discussions how one could attempt to implement it.
Thanks!
Erwin
There is no official sample, per se, but it perhaps bears repeating that a NAT
punchthrough implementation is as simple as:
Set up a third-party ENet host C. Hosts A and B connect to C. C gives A the
address of B. A directly connects to B. A and B disconnect from C.
On 05/04/2013 07:30 PM, Erwin Coumans wrote:
Hi,
I found many discussions on the topic but
no working sample code for NAT punchthrough with enet.
Is there any self-contained sample source that works with enet?
Thanks,
Erwin
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
ENet-discuss at cubik.org
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
