The ordering on different channels is completely independent. That is the point of them. If they were interlocked with respect to ordering, there would be no reason to have channels at all.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I know the ENet make sure the the order of reliable packet > > But how about the packet in different channel? > > sender: > send packet A in channel 0 > send packet B in channel 1 > > Dose receiver always receive A first and the B? > > if not, any suggestions about this problem? > > Thanks, > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > _______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
