Hi Lee Salzman, I GOT IT
Thanks a lot!! 2016-08-26 10:08 GMT+08:00 Lee Salzman <[email protected]>: > The ordering on different channels is completely independent. That is > the point of them. If they were interlocked with respect to ordering, > there would be no reason to have channels at all. > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I know the ENet make sure the the order of reliable packet > > > > But how about the packet in different channel? > > > > sender: > > send packet A in channel 0 > > send packet B in channel 1 > > > > Dose receiver always receive A first and the B? > > > > if not, any suggestions about this problem? > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ENet-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
