I think user group is fine but not changing it clan. Not a good idea. Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2013, at 2:51 PM, "William Jon McCann" <william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In the process of doing some cleanup of our online presence, I noticed that > our local community team experience isn't very cohesive or inviting. > > We have a bunch of stuff scattered around the wiki with the center of it > apparently being https://wiki.gnome.org/UserGroups . > > While the term LUG or UG may resonate with some older users it doesn't really > seem too inviting to me or some of the people I've tried to reach out to > (ugh). > > So, I started thinking about what groups of gnomes might be called... > > Something that is a word and not an acronym. > Something that avoids the tired old patterns. > Something that is a warm, inviting, and evokes kinship. > > How about being part of a clan? > > I propose that we: > > * Rename https://wiki.gnome.org/UserGroups to https://wiki.gnome.org/Clans > * Move individual team content under that page (eg. > https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeBrasil -> https://wiki.gnome.org/Clans/Brasil) > * Streamline the presentation of the clans page and add a map > > What do you think? Should we go ahead? > > Thanks, > Jon > > > PS. If you insist on justification by acronym here you go: community [for] > local activity and networking :) > > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > engagement-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
