On 3 December 2013 17:19, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Fabio Duran Verdugo
> <fabiogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On mar, 2013-12-03 at 12:28 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> As mentioned in the other answers, I don't think that "Clan" is the,
>>> right word. It sounds restrictive and closed, rather than welcoming.
>>> And
>>> it brings memories of people playing Diablo in groups in my teenage
>>> years:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clan_(computer_gaming)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>
>> I don't thing too "clan" is the right word. I like "user group", On
>> chile for example for GNOME Chile we are using "user group", It is more
>> common to recognize, and fine to me.
>> Too, in Chile the word clan as say Bastian is related with computer
>> gaming, but too has a bad connotation (is not my impression, I asked
>> people in my work), an exaggerated example, but valid "clan steals
>> cars".
>>
>
> How about sodality?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodality_%28social_anthropology%29
> here is an excerpt (from wikipedia, thanks wikipedia!)
>
> Sodalities are often based on common age or gender, with all-male
> sodalities more common than all-female. One aspect of a sodality is
> that of a group "representing a certain level of achievement in the
> society, much like the stages of an undergraduate's progress through
> college [university]" [2].
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sodality

I don't think that a noun for which one feels the need to link to a
dictionary is common enough, as we have an international community
where not all members are fluent in English :)

> You could also say 'societies'. Which gives it a bit of a party feel.
>
> sri
> _______________________________________________
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Reply via email to