----- Original Message ----- > From: "Geert Jansen" <gjan...@redhat.com> > To: "Ayal Baron" <aba...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Andrew Cathrow" <acath...@redhat.com>, engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Simon > Grinberg" <sgrin...@redhat.com>, "Saggi > Mizrahi" <smizr...@redhat.com>, "Ori Liel" <ol...@redhat.com>, "Yair > Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com>, "Miki > Kenneth" <mkenn...@redhat.com>, "Einav Cohen" <eco...@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:10:37 AM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated > > > On 05/10/2012 09:46 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: > > > device is what is being mounted and in the case of NFS is > > server:path > > > > There is a reason why we termed it PosixFS and not SharedFS and > > that users can specify local devices/FS's (and there is no reason > > to limit it). > > > > Note that if user defines a local FS and adds 2 hosts to the Posix > > FS DC then 1 host will be non-op > > Why? This makes some very interesting use cases a lot more difficult > to > set up. We should allow multiple hosts in a PosixFS data center, and > it > should be the user's responsibility that if he adds multiple hosts, > that > each of those see the same data.
I *think* we're saying the same thing. If you have multiple hosts in a datacenter with PosixFS then it's your responsibility to make sure that they can all see the same storage > > Regards, > Geert > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel