Maor Lipchuk has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: core: Remove unexisting Storage Domain will be roll forward.
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(9 comments)

....................................................
Commit Message
Line 3: AuthorDate: 2013-10-14 16:13:15 +0300
Line 4: Commit:     Maor Lipchuk <[email protected]>
Line 5: CommitDate: 2013-10-14 17:47:56 +0300
Line 6: 
Line 7: core: Remove unexisting Storage Domain will be roll forward.
done
Line 8: 
Line 9: Remove of a Storage Domain which no longer exists causes a failure in
Line 10: the engine and block the user from removing the storage.
Line 11: 


Line 5: CommitDate: 2013-10-14 17:47:56 +0300
Line 6: 
Line 7: core: Remove unexisting Storage Domain will be roll forward.
Line 8: 
Line 9: Remove of a Storage Domain which no longer exists causes a failure in
done
Line 10: the engine and block the user from removing the storage.
Line 11: 
Line 12: The following patch validate if the storage domain was not removed due
Line 13: to the reason of non existence, and if so it will roll-forward and 
deletes


Line 6: 
Line 7: core: Remove unexisting Storage Domain will be roll forward.
Line 8: 
Line 9: Remove of a Storage Domain which no longer exists causes a failure in
Line 10: the engine and block the user from removing the storage.
done
Line 11: 
Line 12: The following patch validate if the storage domain was not removed due
Line 13: to the reason of non existence, and if so it will roll-forward and 
deletes
Line 14: it any how.


Line 8: 
Line 9: Remove of a Storage Domain which no longer exists causes a failure in
Line 10: the engine and block the user from removing the storage.
Line 11: 
Line 12: The following patch validate if the storage domain was not removed due
done
Line 13: to the reason of non existence, and if so it will roll-forward and 
deletes
Line 14: it any how.
Line 15: 
Line 16: Change-Id: I9515a5ddfcaa965c2bad1883f0543494915b8c7d


Line 9: Remove of a Storage Domain which no longer exists causes a failure in
Line 10: the engine and block the user from removing the storage.
Line 11: 
Line 12: The following patch validate if the storage domain was not removed due
Line 13: to the reason of non existence, and if so it will roll-forward and 
deletes
done
Line 14: it any how.
Line 15: 
Line 16: Change-Id: I9515a5ddfcaa965c2bad1883f0543494915b8c7d
Line 17: Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1001626


....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/storage/RemoveStorageDomainCommand.java
Line 184:         DetachStorageDomainFromPoolParameters params = new 
DetachStorageDomainFromPoolParameters(domId, poolId);
Line 185:         params.setDestroyingPool(getParameters().getDestroyingPool());
Line 186: 
Line 187:         return getBackend()
Line 188:                 
.runInternalAction(VdcActionType.DetachStorageDomainFromPool,
I'm quite sure we can not get it here, but this is not relevant to the fix
Line 189:                         params).getSucceeded();
Line 190:     }
Line 191: 
Line 192:     protected boolean formatStorage(StorageDomain dom, VDS vds) {


Line 194:             return getVdsBroker()
Line 195:                     .RunVdsCommand(VDSCommandType.FormatStorageDomain,
Line 196:                             new 
FormatStorageDomainVDSCommandParameters(vds.getId(), 
dom.getId())).getSucceeded();
Line 197:         } catch (VdcBLLException e) {
Line 198:             if (e.getVdsError().getCode() != 
VdcBllErrors.StorageDomainDoesNotExist) {
1. done

2. I prefer it that way, it is more efficient
Line 199:                 throw e;
Line 200:             }
Line 201:             log.warnFormat("Storage Domain {0} which was about to be 
formatted was not exists in VDS id {1}",
Line 202:                     vds.getId(),


Line 197:         } catch (VdcBLLException e) {
Line 198:             if (e.getVdsError().getCode() != 
VdcBllErrors.StorageDomainDoesNotExist) {
Line 199:                 throw e;
Line 200:             }
Line 201:             log.warnFormat("Storage Domain {0} which was about to be 
formatted was not exists in VDS id {1}",
well, it is only the log so I don't think it is that relevant, but change it as 
suggested
Line 202:                     vds.getId(),
Line 203:                     dom.getId());
Line 204:             return true;
Line 205:         }


Line 199:                 throw e;
Line 200:             }
Line 201:             log.warnFormat("Storage Domain {0} which was about to be 
formatted was not exists in VDS id {1}",
Line 202:                     vds.getId(),
Line 203:                     dom.getId());
1. done

2. done
Line 204:             return true;
Line 205:         }
Line 206:     }
Line 207: 


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/20158
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9515a5ddfcaa965c2bad1883f0543494915b8c7d
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Maor Lipchuk <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Allon Mureinik <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Erez <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Liron Ar <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maor Lipchuk <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sergey Gotliv <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tal Nisan <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to