"Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)" wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:19:26 -0500 Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Ben Rockwood wrote: > > > > > > > > (snip) > > > been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of > > > > Well, one of the points of doing new/early development in cvs is that > > you don't maintain a changelog... > > technically cvs does this for us :) >
Well, that was partially my point. But now that I think about it: - No, cvs only tracks who changes what. We need to encourage commit comments that say what the change does functionally. - I'd suggest not using the ChangeLog files on pre 1.0 apps/libs and sticking to it. For packages that are stable, then a ChangeLog should be maintained. Does anything in the e17 tree fall in that category yet? Maybe efsd, you might say evas, entice, ...? That's a small percentage. -- Kevin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
