On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:55:22 +0200 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

> Hi,
> guess I really screwed up that _prop_layer_set() function as it didn't
> honour other atoms that might have been set by the WM.
> 
> AFAIK, I did it right now. The attached patch includes all of the
> changes I made during the last three days, so you can forgot about those
> other patches ;p
> 
> This new patch also adds _window_prop_sticky_set(), which sets/unsets
> the sticky state of a window.
> 
> Please comment ;)

ok comments.

i'm not sure about ecore_x_window_prop_delete_request_set() being deleted and
replaced by ecore_x_window_prop_protocol_set() calls. though i can see where
you're getting at. not sure there. what's your reasoning here?

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
熊耳 - 車君                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile Phone: +61 (0)413 451 899    Home Phone: 02 9698 8615


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to