On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:20:19 +0100 "Tilman Sauerbeck"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> At the moment, there are just two atoms in the enumeration, but IIRC, there
> are some more which might be implemented in ecore_x in the future as well.
there might be.. but i have never seen those wm protocols atoms expanded
before.. so i never expected it as such :) i didnt want to expose the
implimentation at the api level... but i do see your point :)
> Using a single function keeps the code clean, duplicating code sucks ;)
then again also does 1 function does all - you just need to remember the 80000
options to it too :) hehehhe
> If you guys don't like this approach, I can change it back, though I don't see
> the disadvantage in doing it the way I did :)
patch is in :) see cvs :)
> Regards,
> Tilman
--
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
熊耳 - 車君 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile Phone: +61 (0)413 451 899 Home Phone: 02 9698 8615
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
