On Mon 26 Apr 16:28 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 April 2004, at 11:56:42 (+1000),
> Martien Verbruggen wrote:
>
> > The changes should be backward compatible, i.e. no programs compiled
> > against 0.7 should need changes, or should display changes in
> > behaviour. There is a single new API function
> > (Epplet_Loop_Iteration(int block)), which takes a single argument
> > specifying whether the iteration should block or not.
>
> How extensively have you tested this? Just glancing over the code, it
> seems like it would break recurring timers.
Recurring timers? As in ones that reset themselves from the code that is
executed? That bit works.
If you have some code that you want me to test, or a specific epplet
from the distribution, I'll be happy to do that.
Martien
--
|
Martien Verbruggen | In the fight between you and the world, back
| the world - Franz Kafka
|
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
