On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:38:19 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
(B
(B> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 09:33 pm, till varoquaux wrote:
(B> > I think an enlightenment wiki would be interesting. Since everybody
(B> > agrees there is a great lack of documentation a wiki would prove really
(B> > helpfull.
(B>
(B> i hate wiki's ... rarely do i find them the least bit useful either in content
(B
(B> or in presentation
(B
(Btrue - but we need a way to make it easier to manage/access e.org, update it
(Bwith multiple people doing it.
(B
(B
(B--
(B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B)
(B
(B
(B-------------------------------------------------------
(BThe SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
(BGet a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
(BIt's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
(B_______________________________________________
(Benlightenment-devel mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
