Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >i had no use for them, thus didnt support them. they would need lots of >metadata defining the gradient, angle, line endpoints etc. the gradient object >is limtied in that it fills a rectangle with a gradient - that's it. lines are >well non-anti-aliased ugly lines. very little use for them imho. thus they >havent been put into edje. same as polygon objects. > I could see the gradient being possibly useful if we ever add arbitrary shaped clip objects (clip to alpha of image maybe?). Right now I just use plain old images for all my gradient needs. I'm curious though, is there any performance benefit to using a gradient object over an image of a gradient?
Also, if someone takes the time to add some AA routines for lines and polys would you be opposed to adding line/poly edje objects? -- rephorm ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
