Blake Barnett wrote: >Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > >>actually - evoak was an entirely different beast. :) >> >> >> >> >> > >I know it's entirely different, but it _allows_ some of the same >features. And I'm assuming that one of the big reasons for emu is to >allow anyone to create an app that can gain the benefits of the e17 >canvas without creating a module... Sure sounds like the original set of >features evoak provided. :) > >If I'm wrong there please enlighten me! > > >
Ok, let me enlighten myself. I read the IRC log that brought about the idea for emu. I see now how they are completely different since Evoak would never allow manipulation of E's internals the way a module can. (Like the dynamic menu system Surtsey proposed) So anyway.... nothing to see here, I hope they both get done. :) -Blake ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
