On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:57:47PM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Tuesday, 29 November 2005, at 21:49:24 (+0000), > Andrew Williams wrote: > > > Many apologies, I do not remember which leak this is that you refer to. > > Allow me to refresh your memory...again....: > > 1251 <KainX[#edevelop]> tilman: I'd like to see it imported so that > edb_gtk_ed in libs/edb can die die die die die. > 1251 <tilman[#edevelop]> although. > 1251 <tilman[#edevelop]> embrace is the only app that still needs edb :> > 1251 <dj2[#edevelop]> if we can kill of edb, no reason for an editor, heh > 1251 <KainX[#edevelop]> EET doesn't use edb? Nor epeg? > 1251 <tilman[#edevelop]> i won't switch to ecore_config until it works > properly > 1251 <tilman[#edevelop]> KainX: o_O > 1251 <tilman[#edevelop]> KainX: they don't > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> epeg modifies jpeg headers > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> eet has its own data format > 1252 <KainX[#edevelop]> And everything else uses eet... > 1252 <KainX[#edevelop]> What does embrace use edb for? > 1252 <dj2[#edevelop]> tilman, what doesnt' work for you? > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> atmos: now look at the beautiful code and WEEP > 1252 <dj2[#edevelop]> KainX, except etox > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> KainX: configuration > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> dj2: last i checked it still leaked > 1252 <KainX[#edevelop]> Ah > 1252 <dj2[#edevelop]> ah > 1252 <tilman[#edevelop]> non-trivial to fix > 1253 <tilman[#edevelop]> so i won't do it > 1253 <tilman[#edevelop]> and i won't depend on a leaky lib > 1253 <atmos[#edevelop]> tilman it's all redact right ? > 1253 <tilman[#edevelop]> redact and of course embryo_cc > 1255 <KainX[#edevelop]> tilman: Is raster aware of the leak? > 1255 <tilman[#edevelop]> iirc, yes > 1256 <KainX[#edevelop]> Does he plan to fix it? > 1256 <englebass[#edevelop]> Isn't HandyAndE the ecore-config man? > 1256 <tilman[#edevelop]> englebass: yes, but he kinda ignored me/shrugged off > the issue > 1257 <KainX[#edevelop]> tilman: HandyAndE did, or raster did? > 1257 <tilman[#edevelop]> KainX: andy > > (from August 30th) >
well, I sincerely apologise for not remembering this, but even after the refresher I do not recall what the problem was - does someone have a specific point, or is an "in general it leaks" issue? > > Not sure that "asleep at the wheel" counts. If nothing else I think > > that many folk agree that managing the E web site is now a lot > > easier, and XSM does take a lot of my time > > Content management systems are a dime a dozen. Any CMS would've been > an improvement, and I don't see anything XSM offers over the more > mature alternatives. But that's really beside the point. > "dime a dozen" hmm, weird - I seem to remember that sf.net caused no end of trouble with their "no web server can write to web space" directive. List a dozen that work well with sf.net space and I might consider giving you a dime :-p > > Michael Jennings (a.k.a. Moany argument maker) > > That's just sad. nothing better to do with my time, clearly :-p > > Michael > A ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
