On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:21:49 -0600 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 3/29/06, Blake B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It was also the only AND preferred mirror. I think we could > > distribute that load fairly well with 4 or 5 mirrors. A good way to > > load balance them would be awesome. I don't think IPVS would work, > > and DNS round-robin is too tricky with possible synchronization > > issues. Anyone have any ideas? > > Horms may have some suggestions with his SuperSparrow work. that requires us running our own dns servers as the dns returns are based on network locality (ie a database that has all the ip blocks known about and where they are and it directs you to the closest one via dns). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
