On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Pierre Couderc <pie...@couderc.eu> wrote: > On 12/18/2017 05:28 PM, Stephen Houston wrote: >> >> "If we are to de-prioritise the new API at the cost of further development >> of legacy APIs then we are prolonging the period of time in which we >> request developers to use an API which we are intending to discontinue." >> >> I don't disagree. But if we de-prioritize the old API at the cost of >> furthering the development of new API then we are encouraging the >> development of unstable apis that are not complete and won't have a stable >> release for X amount of time. Which isn't exactly ideal either. I don't >> think either option sounds great and it's going to get to a point of >> "Don't >> use that api, it will be discontinued, but don't use that api either >> because it is unstable, incomplete, and will change". New developers will >> look at that say... uh... okay so what do I use? Something other than EFL. >> >> > I am glad to have developed my first application under efl (eegrep = > multidimensional grep). > With legacy API. > Should I regret not having used Gnome ?
The more there are EFL apps, the better. But the project should also do advertising (phoronix, /., linuxfr.org for french, reddit, lwn, etc...) imho Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
