On Monday, 11 September 2006, at 23:29:11 (+0300), Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> Prior to diving into the "what to use" discussion See, I don't think that's the conversation we should be having right now. We're using XSM right now. Unless there is some fundamental flaw in XSM that cannot be overcome, we need to stick with it. So if there are problems with XSM, let's identify them. 1. Speed This will be resolved when we go local, as best I can tell from playing with the demo. 2. Unintuitive? Blake says XSM's editing interface is unintuitive. I can see some room for improvement, but straight HTML in a textarea seems pretty intuitive to me, albeit not as user-friendly as it could be. There is a definite advantage to having one of the developers of the CMS we're using on our team. The problem is, everyone speaks in abstracts: "It's painful!" "I don't like it!" More specific (constructive!) criticisms will ultimately result in a more usable XSM as well as a better site for E. So...anyone want to start with #3? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I'll be leaving soon; it's hard to say when I'll return, and I don't want to lead you on. So if you feel the need, close your eyes and share this dream. It will be Eternity." -- Blessid Union of Souls, "Forever for Tonight" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
