Dave [2007-02-24 02:11]: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ha scritto: > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:53:16 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >> dan sinclair [2007-02-05 12:17]: > >> > >>> Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > >>> > >>>> DaveMDS [2007-02-05 05:05]: > >>>> > >>>>> here's a patch for edje_decc that create a file called default.edc in > >>>>> the decompiled source dir. > >>>>> > >>>>> The file contents is only a line that include the main edc file. > >>>>> If the default.edc file exist none is created > >>>>> With this patch I can open edj file from edje_editor (engrave run > >>>>> edje_decc and always open default.edc). > >>>>> > >>>> NAK. Breaks compatibility with redact for no good reason. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> It used to be that edje would output the main .edc file as > >>> main_edje_source.edc (or something similar) this made life for engrave > >>> really easy as we'd just look for that file. Now, it uses whatever the > >>> coder sets as their default file. > >>> > >>> We have no-way to know what the main .edc file is called anymore. (Well, > >>> besides parsing the rebuild script I think). Having it either rename he > >>> main .edc file to something common, or spitting out a commonly named > >>> file means that an editor can open the .edc files decompiled from the > >>> .edj file. > >>> > >> The correct way would be of course to just read the EET. > >> But maybe you want to introduce another edje_decc switch that overrides > >> the name of the first SourceFile entry (= main file name). > >> > >> edje_decc --main_file BLAH.EDC > >> > >> It's a hack, but I still think that the concept of Engrave isn't quite > >> perfect :o > >> > >> Regards, > >> Tilman > >> > > > > parsing build.sh is probably a clean way to do this - or making it a > > different > > name that hasnt been used before (eg edje.edc) which wouldnt break anything > > (and ALWAYS write it) :) > > > > > > > Arghh. I had my mail server down until now, and I lost the end of > discussion, sorry :( > > So... we can also write a file named (for example) main_edc.txt and > write inside the name of the main source file. > Make it as you prefer but please do it, I really need this for the editor. > In the future I want to read the edj directly, but for now I need to > decompile the file.
That's fugly. Why not do it like I suggested? Gets you the same functionality with less uglyness. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpq4gZVXM6f5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
