[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-28 14:14]: > > Dave [2007-02-27 12:58]: > >> Tilman Sauerbeck ha scritto: > >> >Dave [2007-02-24 02:11]: > >> > > >> >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ha scritto: > >> >> > >> >>>On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:53:16 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck > >> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >>>babbled: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>>dan sinclair [2007-02-05 12:17]: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>>Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>>DaveMDS [2007-02-05 05:05]: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>here's a patch for edje_decc that create a file called > >> default.edc > >> >>>>>>>in the decompiled source dir. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>The file contents is only a line that include the main edc file. > >> >>>>>>>If the default.edc file exist none is created > >> >>>>>>>With this patch I can open edj file from edje_editor (engrave run > >> >>>>>>>edje_decc and always open default.edc). > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>NAK. Breaks compatibility with redact for no good reason. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>It used to be that edje would output the main .edc file as > >> >>>>>main_edje_source.edc (or something similar) this made life for > >> engrave > >> >>>>>really easy as we'd just look for that file. Now, it uses whatever > >> the > >> >>>>>coder sets as their default file. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>We have no-way to know what the main .edc file is called anymore. > >> >>>>>(Well, besides parsing the rebuild script I think). Having it > >> either > >> >>>>>rename he main .edc file to something common, or spitting out a > >> >>>>>commonly named file means that an editor can open the .edc files > >> >>>>>decompiled from the .edj file. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>The correct way would be of course to just read the EET. > >> >>>>But maybe you want to introduce another edje_decc switch that > >> overrides > >> >>>>the name of the first SourceFile entry (= main file name). > >> >>>> > >> >>>>edje_decc --main_file BLAH.EDC > >> >>>> > >> >>>>It's a hack, but I still think that the concept of Engrave isn't > >> quite > >> >>>>perfect :o > >> >>>> > >> >>>>Regards, > >> >>>>Tilman > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>parsing build.sh is probably a clean way to do this - or making it a > >> >>>different > >> >>>name that hasnt been used before (eg edje.edc) which wouldnt break > >> >>>anything > >> >>>(and ALWAYS write it) :) > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> Like raster said, I have done a new patch that ALWAYS create a file > >> named > >> main_edje_source.edc > >> This file simply include the user main source. > >> I think that this doesn't break anything. > >> If you prefer can also change the name of the created file. > > > > And as I already said, this breaks redact. Want me to make my suggestion > > for an elegant and world-compatible implementation again? ;p > > > Ok sorry, I can't understand what you mean with 'breaks redact' (what is > redact?). > But go on...
redact is my alternate Edje compiler. It writes the same files as edje_cc, but works with different input. > If I make the creation of the file only when you specify a command line > switch is good for you? like: > edje_decc -d <file_name> > This will create an additional file called for ex. main_edc_to_load.edc > If you agree I will made the patch in this way. Okay, I can implement my suggestion on top of that then... ;) Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpjwCxPFv13z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
