At least it would be better to show an error, than just returning, right? - Kenneth
On 11/17/07, Ulisses Furquim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 2:11 PM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this a proper fix or hiding a bug in the calling application (or > > another part of the lib)? I would think the application should be > > responsible of knowing when they should unref the connection. > > I strongly agree with you. I don't like this type of "defensive" > programming that hides real errors. It seems we need a proper fix > somewhere else, indeed. > > -- Ulisses > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
