On Nov 18, 2007 2:07 PM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rather than introducing another internal dependency that may > complicate things when ecore is eventually split up, could these go in > the Ecore_Data definitions? I believe everything in ecore depends on > this either directly or indirectly anyways. Yeah, the idea of adding Ecore_Support is not to really have an Ecore_Support.h or anything, but to have a place where these (EAPI, ...) definitions could be added and stop duplicated code all over the place. Ecore_Data may be a good place to add these.
BR -- Andre Moreira Magalhaes (andrunko) -------------------------------------------------------- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: andrunko Blog: http://andrunko.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
