-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:54 +0300
"Viktor Kojouharov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> regarding the xml parser, why not use exml, if it is maintained at
> all. since it is in cvs, it's most likely a dependency for something
> else already.

I choose libxml instead of exml because exml doesn't provide a SAX
parser, but only a DOM parser, and i prefer the first one.

Massimiliano
- -- 
Massimiliano Calamelli
http://mcalamelli.netsons.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIiDe1leGEL56NNP4RAmz4AJsF7SjmnzqTvRUUo/NlJ3cTCZ1bAQCfZvha
eMK9EPtzlV112ZKlixmyvnA=
=TH4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to