On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Lionel ORRY wrote:
> Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for the hint. Indeed the manual sequence for autofoo works better. ok. I don't understand why, but when I have problems with autogen, I do that. I asked on the autoconf ML about a similar problem some times ago, no answer yet. > I had some compilation errors then, that I could fix using the > modifications in the attachment. They are just temporary workaround > that worked for me ; I suppose the presence of libsecur32.lib should > be checked (and conditional compilation of evil_pwd.c adjusted as a > consequence) actually, no need to be checked: you run mingw, so you are sure that that static lib exists. I'll fix that when I switch to Win XP this week end. First, I have to check something on Win CE. > and the replacement of _WIN32_WCE=0x0420 by > _WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 is, of course, only for my machine. I'm wondering if setting _WIN32_WINNT is really necessary, but I plan to actually target at least Win XP, so setting it to 0x0501 is not a bad idea. I'll have to check anyway. On the contrary, setting _WIN32_WCE directly in Makefile.am is not good at all :) > Does autoconf have a macro to get WINVER ? I used the following > snippet of code to get my version : [snip] I don't think that autoconf provides such macro. Evil is in a good shape. I'm considering doing a release soon, and binaries for Win XP and Win CE. Thank you Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
