On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gustavo wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> And btw, why would one be so foolish, when implementing the >>> size-load-opts >>> down-scaling for jpgs, that they would simply software down-scale all the >>> way >>> from the src size down to the load-opt size? Why would they not do just >>> what >>> you're suggesting people do themselves - find the nearest power-of-2 >>> fraction, >>> jpg-downscale to that, and then software down-scale the rest of the way? >>> :) >>> >> >> Jose, all these 3 huge mails from you resume into a single api change: >> add a force flag to parameters, that's it. >> >> This last mail that request users to do power-of-2 on their side is as >> bad as you say it's to create a temporary canvas, it requires too much >> knowledge on user size, in this case require user to know about JPEG >> properties. >> >> > > No, no. Quite the opposite. It's the current situation that demands people > do this. What I'm saying is that the jpg loader should do this itself, ie. > respect image size load-opts and implement it so that it does this.
You both have a point, that's why I say the solution is to add a force flag. Force=1 is what you want, Force=0 is what raster want, simple. >> PS: try to sent one single mail with all contents, the more >> "compressed" the better, it's hard to keep up with tons of mail with >> huge replies to themselves. Often I just lack motivation to finish >> reading your mails, I need to postpone reading to sometime I have more >> free time and I really loose lots of time trying to find the useful >> bits among all of them (there is always good stuff). >> > > Who me? Write multiple, lengthy, rambling emails as my thoughts move along > and I get the chance to actually write... :) > > I'll try Gustavo, I'll try. :) Save a draft for at least 12hours, then review, edit and mail the final version... It's rare you to get a reply before that time, so it will be about the same (you'll not loose some replies or so). :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
