On Tuesday, 14 April 2009, at 20:01:10 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:

> lol... the *warning* is the good thing about not initializing
> variables: you know when you miss it. As I said, if it was useful to
> init things to 0, then gcc would do it already, don't you think?

If it weren't useful, calloc() wouldn't do it, don't you think?

> ok, I'm getting out of this thread. Keep believing in your computer
> science 101 myths and be happy.

Ad hominem is generally used by unsophisticated individuals with
indefensible positions.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <m...@kainx.org>
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I now cry streams of blood because I had to take my stand.  I crush
  my eyes beneath my heel as my heart pulses in my hand."
                                                         -- "Forsaken"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to