On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless > (de)compression library: > > http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/ > > which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than > zlib. > > There is no comparison numbers, but maybe it is worth trying to > compare zlib and that lib to see if it would be better to use it in > eet. There are other contenders, generally more modern compression schemes that are generally ignored coz things like zip, gz, and bz2 are too firmly embedded in our conciousness. Too much historical inertia is not good. So, if this is to be done, a more thorough roundup of them all would be the way to go.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
