On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > >> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless >> (de)compression library: >> >> http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/ >> >> which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than >> zlib. >> >> There is no comparison numbers, but maybe it is worth trying to >> compare zlib and that lib to see if it would be better to use it in >> eet. > > There are other contenders, generally more modern compression schemes > that are generally ignored coz things like zip, gz, and bz2 are > too firmly embedded in our conciousness. Too much historical inertia > is not good. > > So, if this is to be done, a more thorough roundup of them all would be > the way to go. Maybe it's not so good for us: that library is GPL. If I'm not mistaken, that would mean that eet must be GPL too, right ? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
