On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:07 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote : > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <r...@1407.org> > wrote: > > Em 28-02-2010 14:37, Vaudano Luca escreveu: > >> Just out of curiosity, why is glib not advised? > > > > You're taking it the wrong way. The advice was to use the functionality > > that is in EFL instead of picking up the same functionality from > > external libraries. > > Actually some things are not even EFL, but simple POSIX calls like > strdup() instead of g_strdup(), asprintf() instead of > g_strdup_printf() > > This not being against fair glib usage, but those are abuses that > don't need to exist and Rui kindly fixed those.
I wouldn't consider using g_strdup_printf vs. asprintf an abuse. asprint is a GNU-specific extension, and is not guaranteed to be available. g_strdup_printf, OTOH, is part on the glib API, which guarantees that it's available on a fair - and defined - set of plartforms. That being said, please note that I'm not arguing against the change. Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
