On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mikhail Gusarov <dotted...@dottedmag.net> wrote: > > Twas brillig at 16:21:09 28.02.2010 UTC+01 when albin.tonne...@gmail.com did > gyre and gimble: > > AT> I wouldn't consider using g_strdup_printf vs. asprintf an > AT> abuse. asprint is a GNU-specific extension, and is not guaranteed > AT> to be available. g_strdup_printf, OTOH, is part on the glib API, > AT> which guarantees that it's available on a fair - and defined - set > AT> of plartforms.
Well, it is used in lots of efl code, that runs on other platforms... so that's part of the porting effort, so far not required or done in Evil or some other tool. > Not even saying that asprintf interface is abomination. Why? It's the regular printf() interface. Do you mean because you get the size of the string as result and you must get the string from a parameter output? It's C, we have to live with that. The size return IS useful, it will avoid subsequent strlen(), for example if you want to eina_stringshare_add() you could use the faster eina_stringshare_add_length() variant, same for other functions such as eina_str_*_full variants. BR, -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
