On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Andrian Nord wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:48AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >> it is an argument.. why? because it's our code. our repository. those bugs >> have >> existed - i remember vaguel working on it - no, i didn't have a link- hell i >> dont think i had a link at the time. it was discovered, fixed so it worked >> and >> did no harm, then we moved on. > > Just in case, if we will provide working autofoo scripts (patches or etc) for > some > package, that keeps in general same behaviour as original has - will you > apply them? > > I'm speaking now about so called 'automagic', when particular packages > (including core ones, like ecore or eina) switching off/on some features > depending on existence of some packages and user can't explicitelly > request or disable this checks and builds. if there is a problem with a feature that can't be enabled/disabled while it should be, then it is a bug and you can open a ticket for that. Vincet ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
