On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Massimo Maiurana <maiur...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd keep both of them and load both by default, so every user can try them and > choose what he/she prefer in that particular moment, i.e. one would choose > exebuf to just run a simple command and choose everything if wants to perform > a more complex task. > also, they should have different icons to remark they are different things.
This is highly pointless. They do the same thing, there is no point in enabling one. Nobody in earth should think about "will I launch something with A, B or C", this is just bad usability. > while we're at it, is there any particular reason why the everything module is > excluded from localization? is there any objection if I enable it in > POTFILES.in? of course not, go for it. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
