On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Jennings <m...@kainx.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 May 2010, at 15:02:50 (-0300), > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> Well, the problem is solved, but I quite disagree with this until we >> release EFL. Some distros like Debian and RHEL have the bad habit of >> holding versions for too long. In the case of RHEL, the 6 is around >> the corner... but I doubt if someone would use E/EFL in that setup, >> it is not the kind of target audience I guess. > > I use EFL on RHEL5, and I know lots of other people smart enough to > know that Fedora is not a stable or reliable platform, and if you want > your desktop to work the same way your servers do, that means RHEL on > the desktop. And it works quite well there. > > So yes, people use E and the EFL in exactly that setup. > > But in terms of sheer marketing, if EFL won't build on the most > popular Linux platform in the US, if not the world, that doesn't make > RHEL look old. It makes E look broken. Period. And that's bad for > us.
Ok, you have a good point. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
